|
Post by dickdelmi on Feb 12, 2018 14:18:16 GMT -5
Here are two shots of my latest project hacked from Vectrics wildlife series (over six hours of machine time). The final cuts were made with a 1/8 ball point at 40 ipm and 33% stepover. The final detail was not as good as I had hoped. How could it be improved? Perhaps a 1/16 ball point at 25% stepover? The material is clear cedar. All suggestions are welcome.
|
|
|
Post by BigMoose on Feb 12, 2018 15:34:46 GMT -5
I would start with a smaller cutter. I personally use a 1/16" tapered ball nose end mill.
|
|
|
Post by chuck26287 on Feb 12, 2018 16:36:55 GMT -5
If I'm doing lithophanes in white acrylic, I use a 1/32" balnose bit with 8% stepover for the finish pass. Results are almost photographic. If carving wood, I typically use a 1/16" ballnose as well, also at an 8% stepover. Results are beautiful and highly detailed. But, to get detail, you have to give back in time. Something that size... you're looking at several hours.
|
|
309cnc
Junior Member
Posts: 124
|
Post by 309cnc on Feb 12, 2018 18:07:37 GMT -5
...... 1/32" balnose bit ..... I assume 1/32" Radius? Or diameter? Brand / Model? Thx......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2018 11:03:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by stevem on Feb 13, 2018 11:31:53 GMT -5
The Amans's cost more, but last much longer. Great results every time. For standard cutting, I use Whiteside.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Campbell on Feb 13, 2018 12:24:24 GMT -5
Dick... Use a smaller stepover. Preview your 1/8 bit at 6-8%. Then the 1/16 at 8-10%. Compare to the preview at current settings
|
|
|
Post by germanguitars on Feb 14, 2018 9:07:00 GMT -5
Cedar is soft which makes it easier on the bit, but the tearout can be awful. I would suggest a denser wood that carves better.
|
|
|
Post by traindriver on Feb 14, 2018 18:05:32 GMT -5
I agree with the 1/16th bit ballnose from Amana. I get mine on Amazon. I used to use 1/8 ballnose bits, but the detail from the 1/16th is so much better. I made this out of a cedar log Using these parameters
|
|
|
Post by redwood on Feb 14, 2018 19:39:53 GMT -5
I also use the Amana bits and usually have a stepover of somewhere around 10%
|
|
|
Post by dickdelmi on Feb 15, 2018 13:45:59 GMT -5
Thanks for all of the advice everyone. Sounds like the next one will be 1/16 at 10% - takes a lot longer but the results are worth it. Great job on the cedar log Traindriver.
|
|
|
Post by chuck26287 on Feb 15, 2018 16:16:40 GMT -5
Yep... those are the two I use. I've had GREAT detail results with them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2018 10:17:50 GMT -5
I agree with the 1/16th bit ballnose from Amana. I get mine on Amazon. I used to use 1/8 ballnose bits, but the detail from the 1/16th is so much better. I made this out of a cedar log Using these parameters The changing grain, color and texture looks great. As for stepover, for an 1/16" tip, a step over of 8% (0.005") leaves ridges 0.0001" while 10" (0.0063") doubles the ridge height to 0.0002" so go with what you feel good about. You can check your results here: www.custompartnet.com/calculator/step-over-distance
|
|
|
Post by ricphoto on Feb 19, 2018 10:36:13 GMT -5
I agree with the 1/16th bit ballnose from Amana. I get mine on Amazon. I used to use 1/8 ballnose bits, but the detail from the 1/16th is so much better. I made this out of a cedar log Using these parameters The changing grain, color and texture looks great. As for stepover, for an 1/16" tip, a step over of 8% (0.005") leaves ridges 0.0001" while 10" (0.0063") doubles the ridge height to 0.0002" so go with what you feel good about. You can check your results here: www.custompartnet.com/calculator/step-over-distanceThanks for that link...great visual aid for those of us just getting started and trying to wrap our heads around the cost / benefits of different settings/bits...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2018 10:56:51 GMT -5
Personally, I go with 9% most of the time but for higher quality, I'll go with 8% which take slightly longer. You can calculate your toolpath with 8%, 9%, and 10% to see the difference in cut time.
|
|
|
Post by traindriver on Feb 19, 2018 19:44:17 GMT -5
Thanks for the link fean, that'll come in handy! dickdelmi, don't be afraid to speed up the feed in your tool database. I kept burning my bits and it was a year before it dawned on me that the default values for feed were really low and that I could lessen the cut time by speeding up the feed (and thanks for the compliment!)
|
|